Image default
ElectricityEnergyPower

FG, World Bank retain $730m power sector loan, shifts focus to distribution infrastructure 

FG, World Bank retain $730m power sector loan, shifts focus to distribution infrastructure

 

 

 

Thereare indications that the Federal Government has re-channelled the $730 million World Bank loan to finance a recovery programme in the distribution sub-sector of the power industry.

Industry sources revealed to The Flagship News that the loan, originally deployed under the Power Sector Recovery Programme (PSRP), would now be re-purposed toward Distribution Sector Recovery Operations (DISREP) with metering expansion and the reinforcement of distribution infrastructure as its primary focus. The re-purposing follows the cancellation of the original PSRP objectives after Nigeria was unable to meet the conditions required to access an additional $750 million tranche.

Sources stated that contrary to reports of outright cancellation, the loan has not been withdrawn from Nigeria but redirected to a different area of the power industry. “Nigeria is still the beneficiary of that loan, but it is now re-focused to another area of the power sector,” a source said.

Both parties have agreed on the new direction. The revised programme targets an expansion of the revenue base of distribution companies by metering more customers and bringing them into the billing net. It also covers the reinforcement of distribution infrastructure including substations and distribution transformers, with the ultimate aim of improving electricity supply to consumers across the country.

The government believes this strategy would drive recovery in the distribution sub-sector. Since the players are predominantly private sector operators, they will be required to comply fully with the conditions attached to the loan.

“The loan has not been taken away from us. Nigeria still has access to it for the power sector, but this time to finance recovery in the distribution segment of the industry,” sources said.

Two principal factors are said to have driven the failure of the original PSRP objectives. The first was the inability of the administration at the time to eliminate the sector’s tariff shortfall entirely. In 2019, that shortfall stood at approximately N580 billion. By 2022 it had been reduced to N143 billion, and the target was to bring it down further to around N100 billion by 2023, with full elimination by 2024.

That trajectory was disrupted in June 2023 when the President Bola Tinubu’s administration unified the foreign exchange rate. Because gas supply contracts and much of the sector’s cost base were denominated in or indexed to the dollar, the sharp depreciation of the naira from around N350 to the dollar to over N1,500 caused a dramatic increase in generation costs. The tariff shortfall, which had been on a downward path, surged to an estimated N2 trillion by 2025, making the original PSRP conditions unachievable.

The second factor was political. The government was unable to remove the tariff subsidy in its entirety as required by the World Bank, creating a persistent liquidity gap that could not be bridged under the existing programme framework.

These two developments together, the FX shock and the incomplete subsidy removal, led to the agreement between both parties to cancel the original programme objectives and redirect the loan toward distribution recovery.

It was also gathered that approximately $20 million of the loan, earmarked for technical assistance to agencies including the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), the Nigeria Bulk Electricity Trading Plc (NBET), and the Federal Ministry of Power, remained largely undrawn at the time the original objectives were cancelled. That portion is understood to remain available under the revised programme.

=== The Flagship News ===

Related posts

Petrol price hike; Residents lament rising transport fares

Editor

FG woos global investors, trains 100 youth on CNG, petrol bikes repair

Editor

Winners emerge in NNPC Foundation’s ‘Battle of Energy Titans’ competition

Editor

Leave a Comment